New prosecution by Mark DenHoed, Judge and Prosecuting Attorney

"Docket # 234094: Hannah "Roorda"

You are accused of violating, first and foremost, edict 3.14F (D), for which the punishment is capital. As you are the executioner, I regret that you may have to train a substitute to serve at your execution, should you be found guilty.

The lesser charges against you include commenting on my facebook enough to draw comment from my parents and stalking me via the same social network."

~Mark DenHoed, Judge and Prosecutor

First, what's the point of giving a charge when we don't have an explanation of the charges? Yet again, Mark has proven his inability to be a Judge and Prosecuting Attorney, by providing no argument for the said charge (first one), or any reason for us to believe him. I suggest giving a bit of proof of it --and I mean sound-- proof that she deserves said charges.

And concerning the other prosecution (of Mr. Bertilson), he still hasn't offered any proof of the charges against Mr. Bertilson. He's just announced that he's come to a verdict of guilty on all charges, with no argument for the charges, and no defense, either. I suggest that he learn how to properly prosecute. All Mr. Bertilson got a chance to do is give a few comments on the charges, and then Mr. DenHoed came to the verdict. How about a few defense attorneys, eh?